|
|
 |
 |
Hezbollah: A Tale of Limping Mosquito
By Fauzia Qureshi
“WHOM the
God would destroy, He first makes mad.”— Euripides.
It’s been over a month and Israel hasn’t been able to eliminate Hezbollah
from South Lebanon. Many analysts are of the view that Israel already has
lost the war militarily and politically against Hezbollah.
The war is said to be plastered with military failures — in the air and on
land and the sea. The army that took just six days to rout three big Arab
armies in 1967 hasn’t succeeded in overcoming a small so-called ‘terrorist
organization.’ Why?
Has the Hezbollah grown stronger during the years or is it that Israeli
military has gone weak? How come the most notorious intelligence service of
the world could have underestimated a small ‘terrorist’ organization in
possession of anti-ship missiles?
There is a misunderstanding in Israel and the United States that Israel can
militarily rid Lebanon of Hezbollah, or the party of God. In the first
place, Hezbollah is not just a militia or a conventional army, but a social
and political movement deeply rooted in its society, with a big constituency
within the Lebanese Shia community that comprises about 40% of the country’s
4 million people.
Hezbollah has a welfare system that provides clinics, day-care centres,
schools and jobs to hundreds of thousands of Shia people. So the Shia
community, historically disadvantaged and marginalized in Lebanon are given
a sense of identity, security and pride by this so-called ‘terrorist’
organization.
Secondly, Hezbollah is falsely portrayed as a decaying tooth that can easily
be plucked out. It has time and again proved to be one of the most pivotal
political players on the Lebanese front.
More than a million men and women vote for its candidates in elections. It
has two ministers in the Lebanese Cabinet, 14 seats in Lebanon’s 128 seat
Parliament and a large base support in Lebanon and the Muslim Shia world.
Today, Hezbollah stands taller and more firmer than ever.
It has gained enormous prestige in the Middle East, both among Sunnis and
Shias. The cruel bombardment of Beirut and of Lebanon was supposed to
frighten the Arab nations and the Muslim world into obedience; instead it
has convinced them that a few thousand determined fighters can withstand the
Israeli army.
The result of the present war so far has been frustration. Mr Bush is
frustrated and Ehud Olmert is not only frustrated but furious. It is quite
understandable that Mr Bush realizes that Israel has failed to ‘deliver the
goods.’ Israel was to finish the job in a few days by eliminating the
Hezbollah, turn Lebanon over to the US stooges, thus weaken Iran and perhaps
also lead the way to ‘regime change’ in Syria and Iran.
All this doesn’t seem to be happening, so naturally poor Bush is upset. As
far as Olmert is concerned, he had gone to war to prove to the world that he
is the ‘real’ successor to Sharon. In Israel, Olmert is Prime Minister only
because Ariel Sharon is incapacitated.
What better way to prove his toughness? After all, Sharon was the architect
of Israeli war on Lebanon in the 1980s. What Olmert forgot was that it was
this very war of Sharon that led to the birth of Hezbollah that kept up the
pressure on Israel for almost two decades finally forcing it to withdraw
from Lebanon.
Since the early 1980s Hezbollah has proved itself on the battlefield against
Israeli military might. By 2000, it forced Israel to withdraw under fire
from a small strip of land in southern Lebanon. This time, more than a month
into fighting, Hezbollah is proving resilient.
The current carnage in Lebanon is also weakening pro-Western elements
throughout the region. According to Jordan’s King Abdullah II, a key US ally
who initially blamed Hezbollah for provoking the crisis, “ Arab people see
Hezbollah as a hero because it is fighting Israel’s aggression.”
Thus it is naïve for President Bush to view Lebanon as just another front in
the war on terror. The root causes of the Israeli-Hezbollah confrontation
lie in the unresolved Arab-Israeli conflict and stalled peace process.
It is also very unrealistic for Israel to think that it can destroy
Hezbollah for good.
Israel has to realize that it is fighting a proxy war on behalf of the US.
Israel may dominate Washington, but it is having a far tougher time with
Lebanon.
The deeper Israel advances into Lebanon, the more its troops are exposed to
Hezbollah attack. Bombing and shelling won’t defeat Hezbollah, which
represents a third of Lebanon’s people and is its defacto army.
According to Uri Avnery, an Israeli peace activist, “ Olmert and Peretz
don’t know what they have unleashed: They are not running the war, the war
is running them.” Like US President George Bush in Iraq, their generals
promised them a cake-walk and instead produced a human, political and
military disaster.
Israeli operations are edging dangerously close to Syria. Damascus may be
reluctantly forced into the war. But that’s fine with Bush who would no
doubt like to use Israel as a proxy against Iran’s allies, sparing US
casualties before November’s elections.
A UN Resolution for cease-fire has been adopted by the Security Council
exactly one month after the start of war. Too little and too late. Will
Israel comply? The history suggests otherwise. Israel has asked for
thirty-six hours. What for? Well, to finally achieve its goal — occupy and
depopulate a 20-mile deep chunk of Lebanon to the Litani River until
ofcourse, an international force comes in and subdues of what is left of
Hezbollah.
But who will really send in their forces and without prior agreement with
Hezbollah? Israel claimed that it had a well-prepared strategy to surgically
remove Hezbollah from South Lebanon. But all the world witnessed was a
punishment of the innocent through bombardment. Israel is simply killing
non-combatants to bring about the pressure it hoped would be generated on
the Arab and Muslim world, in particular, Syria, Iran and Hezbollah.
Hezbollah has shown remarkable courage and resilience in the face of
Israel’s massive military might. Israeli unabated bombings, excessive
military fire have failed to shake the Hezbollah’s confidence to fight for
self-determination and self-preservation. The most striking feature of
Hezbollah’s resistance is that it has retaliated though modestly with rocket
firing and has succeeded in bleeding Israel to make her taste the bitterness
of war.
The resolve it has shown in its resistance against the naked Israeli
aggression has taken the US and Israel by surprise. Hezbollah has no doubt
exploded the myth of Israel’s ‘invincibility.’
The US and Israel need to understand that nations, whose cause is based on
justice and righteousness and which are ready to sacrifice for the defence
of their motherland can’t be made to capitulate so easily.
Israel battled Hezbollah for 18 years, losing more than 800 men, and
ultimately lost the war it began. This reminds me of a tale. When God
created a small limping mosquito for Namrood.
The mosquito though one-legged became a nuisance for Namrood which finally
led to his demise. Hezbollah, too, is like a one-legged mosquito in front of
Israel, without any sophisticated arms or high class Air Force jets or sea
cruising submarines. But, created by God to be a nuisance for Israel which
has proved to the world in particular the Muslim and Arab world that if
united Israel can be taken on.
You don’t really need sophisticated weaponry to take your adversary down it
is only your determination and endless persuasion to do so that will defeat
the strongest of the armies in the battlefield.
Though the response of the Muslim world has been disgraceful. It is time for
the Arab and Muslim leaders to wake up and side by such forces created by
God.●
© 2006 Fauzia Qureshi
|
 |
 |
ADVERTISEMENTS
 |
|
|
Place Your Ads Here, Email:
Marketing@PakistanTimes.net |