|
Final Arguments to begin in Air
India bombing Trial
Pakistan
Times
Wire Service
VANCOUVER (Canada): Lawyers
were set to begin crucial final arguments Tuesday in the case of two Sikh
immigrants from India accused of the 1985 mid-air bombing of an Air India
plane which left 329 people dead.
Closing arguments were expected to start with the defence of Ripudaman Singh
Malik, a millionaire businessman in Vancouver. Lawyers for rural mill worker
Ajaib Singh Bagri then were to present their defence, followed by the
prosecution team.
Backdrop
The men, Sikhs who immigrated to Canada from India's northern state of
Punjab, are each charged with eight counts of murder and conspiracy in what
was the world's worst airborne terrorist act before September 11, 2001.
On June 23, 1985, a suitcase exploded at Japan's Narita airport, killing two
baggage handlers as they transferred it to Air India Flight 301 for Bangkok
and Delhi.
Less than an hour later, off the coast of Ireland, a second bomb ripped
through Air India Flight 182 as it flew to London from Montreal. All 329
people on board died.
Hijackings of US Jets
Though separated by long years and thousands of miles, both the 2001
hijackings of four US jets, two of which crashed into New York's World Trade
Center, and the 1985 Air India bombings, were allegedly carried out by
fundamentalists bent on revenge against a foreign government.
Prosecutors contend Malik and Bagri, with others, planted bombs on Air India
jets to punish the Indian government for its 1983 army attack on Sikhdom's
most holy place, the Golden Temple at Amritsar. At the time, Sikh
separatists were fighting for an independent homeland in India's Punjab.
By the time Justice Ian Bruce Josephson of the British Columbia Supreme
Court renders a decision on Malik and Bagri, the Air India case will be
nearly 20 years old.
The Verdict
The verdict is unlikely to be the final chapter in the bombings case,
however, because police continue to investigate other suspects.
Since the trial began in April 2003, Canadian prosecutors have constructed a
complex case against the pair, based on witness testimony, police
interviews, phone records and surveillance.
Of the Court
The trial is being held in a 7.5 million Canadian dollar (5.6 million US)
bunker-like, bomb-proof, bullet-resistant court built especially for this
case.
The court also designated as a remote annex a vast warehouse in a secret
location. Within it is a skeleton of a Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet, named the
Kanishka by Air India.
Parts of the plane were hauled from the bed of the Atlantic Ocean, shipped
to Canada and reconstructed by police.
Prosecutors' Plea
Prosecutors say Sikh extremists in Canada built two suitcase bombs, bought
airline tickets and checked the suitcase bombs onto Vancouver flights
connecting with Air India.
A third man, Inderjit Singh Reyat, has been sentenced to 10 years in prison
for a conviction in the Narita explosion, and was also charged with Bagri
and Malik.
In 2003, Reyat pleaded guilty to manslaughter for supplying bomb materials
and received a five-year sentence.
Both prosecution cases hinge partly on women who were allegedly close to
Malik and Bagri.
The Woman Witnesses
The first woman to testify once worked for Malik and says the pair were in
love. She told the court Malik once confided to her, "We had Air India
crash." Malik's lawyers are expected to reiterate arguments that the woman's
testimony is not credible.
The second woman alleged that Bagri asked to borrow her car about the time
the suitcase bombs were delivered to the airport.
The identity of both women, as with many other witnesses in the case, is
shielded under a publication ban. Two potential witnesses in the case, both
Sikh journalists, were assassinated. Other witnesses allege they have
received threats.●
|